Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: I have $2000 should i get digital or film?

  1. #11
    Inactive Member nate_dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 17th, 2001
    Posts
    115
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    are you aware of how complicated and expensive film is? The lighting, the sound syncing, the editing, the cost of 1 minute of film? Sure it will look better but video has way more freedom for exparimentation.

    ------------------
    I LOVE THE SMELL OF NAPALM IN THE MORNING

  2. #12
    HB Forum Moderator Alex's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 29th, 2000
    Posts
    11,383
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    The very first step one should consider is shooting a roll of 35mm film.

    Learn the basics of frame composition, exposure, ASA sensitivity, shutter speed, contrast, and depth of field.

    Upon successfully shooting a roll or two of 35mm still film, I recommend shooting a short Super-8 film.

    The cost can be super cheap if you already own a camera, heck, a top of the line Canon 1014-xls can be had for only $500. These cameras rock.

    Develop and transfer your first film project to video, and edit on video.

    Once you have completed this step, THEN go and run wild with digital video.

    This way you develop a balance between both the film and digital world, and you will understand better when to choose which format.

    Before you multiply on a calculator, you are supposed to learn the mathematical basics on your own.

    It's the same with film and digital video.

    ------------------
    Alex

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •